In the essay, you must express your opinion on the formulated problem, agreeing or disagreeing with the position of the author, as written in part C of the task.
It is not enough to formally express your opinion: I agree (disagree) with the author. Your position, even if it coincides with the author, should be formulated in a separate sentence.
For example: Thus, the author seeks to convey to the reader the idea that nature has long needed the help of each of us. I fully agree with the author and also believe that humanity should reconsider its consumer attitude to nature.
Then your position must be supported by two arguments. In this part of the work, you must strictly follow the rules for constructing text-reasoning. Argumentation is the abduction of evidence, explanations, examples to substantiate any thought to the listeners (readers) or the interlocutor.
Arguments are evidence given in support of a thesis: facts, examples, statements, explanations — in short, everything that can confirm a thesis.
Giving arguments in an argument essay from the lives of others, you can write: -I remember, somehow, mother (father’s grandmother, friend, acquaintance, etc.) told how … -I think this incident convinces us that (remember which you have designated an author’s position, show that this example is its proof). If you bring your own conclusions and observations as an argument. You can use these phrases: – Of course, my life experience is still very small, but nevertheless, something similar happened in my life: OR: – Despite my rather modest life experience, I recall a similar situation when I (my friend, classmate, acquaintance) … Traditionally-historical experience allows you to refer to the authoritative opinion of any outstanding person, which will make your argument quite strong. Links to authority. It is often advantageous for persuasive to appeal to the “third party” – to refer to the opinion of an authoritative public figure, scientist, specialist in any field, to mention a proverb, saying, appealing to popular wisdom. The strength of such arguments is that using them, we turn to a collective stock of knowledge, which is always greater than that of individuals.